#photo editing

Is shooting in RAW overrated for 99% of photographers?

Is the insistence on shooting in RAW just elitist gatekeeping for most people?

"Is high dynamic range ruining the raw, emotional feel of photography?"

How do you keep your editing workflow fast without sacrificing quality?

Are you using AI for photo editing more or less than last year?

Has AI editing changed how you really shoot now?

Is natural lighting overrated when a good filter can fix anything?

Are you still buying new lenses, or is AI upscaling good enough for 2025?

Photo editing: is doing it yourself always better than letting AI fix it instantly?

Do post-processing presets make you a photographer or just a filter jockey?

Are you still investing in traditional lenses with AI software doing the heavy lifting now?

With Adobe's new fees, are you switching your entire editing workflow?

Are smartphone camera apps still relevant with modern phone cameras?

Does anyone else think paid presets are a massive scam for photography?

Do you still buy presets, or just use free AI filters?

Do filters and presets make you a photographer, or just someone who can edit a bad photo?

How do you balance easy editing with actually getting the shot right in camera?

How do you balance high-end photo editing with 4K video production without burning out?

Is “film simulation” just nostalgia-bait, or does it genuinely produce better results than digital color grading?