#digital photography

Is shooting in RAW overrated for 99% of photographers?

Do film purists secretly look down on digital photographers, or is the old vs. new debate just online noise?

Is "real photography" dying because everyone just shoots on their phone now?

Should we stop fetishizing 'natural' lighting and admit that over-edited photos look better?

Has raw processing become a crutch for lazy photographers who can’t nail exposure in-camera?

Photo editing: is doing it yourself always better than letting AI fix it instantly?

Do you still buy presets, or just use free AI filters?

Do film purists secretly waste more resources than every digital burst shooter combined?

Is the film aesthetic overrated, or do digital purists just hate admitting analog has an edge?

Does raw editing ruin the authenticity of a photo, and are JPEG shooters actually the real artists?

Should we boycott new gear and just shoot with a 10-year-old camera to be truly sustainable?

Has software colour grading changed how you think about saving raw files over JPEGs?

Do you still shoot raw with AI-powered denoising now?

Is AI editing making traditional photo retouching obsolete for your workflow?